“Iron Man” gadgets
I saw Iron Man recently and was completely enthralled. I’ve now developed a miniature Iron Man obsession that will last at least until I’ve seen the movie two more times (or until Indiana Jones or The Dark Knight takes over). Iron Man (as a movie) applies to this blog a bit more than either of my other hotly anticipated summer films does.
Since Iron Man’s first appearance in comics in the 1960’s our digital dependency has grown with the availability of technology. The internet, the cell phone, the laptop; Tony Stark (the man behind the metal mask) remains a hero in 2008 but in many ways a much more relatable one. Perhaps JARVIS (the AI persona controlling Tony’s technologically insane mansion) is not a reality for most of us, but computerized personalities and programmable tasks (universal remotes, etc.) in smaller less expensive doses do exist.
While the idea of super armor and the power of personal flight are still not realistic for the average cinematic consumer the hands free telephone call Tony is able to take while in mid flight is a definite real life connection to an audience. So maybe I can’t take a call while saving the world from terrorism and breaking the sound barrier, but the idea that I too can do two things at once is at least a start.










So what did you think of Indiana Jones? Did digital effects make it better/worse/different than its less digital predecessors?
Indy was a fun movie (obviously it was Indy, and I must say to begin with, I did like it, I really did, I already own the movie poster) but it can’t compare to the originals and I think that does have something to do with the new digital possibilities. It’s like the new Star Wars trilogy vs the old (though obviously not as extreme). Instead of the effects working to enhance the story it was the story forced to fit around specific effects (as in, “we want this character to be able to swing through the trees at some point how can we push the story in that direction”). The movie felt like it had been forced to compromise with itself in more than one place and that hurt the possibility of any over all excellent-ness.